Bug concerning a list of references

Report a Bug
1

Hello,
think i found a display/edit bug concerning a list of references.
I have a type “SVC Definition” which contains only a textfield, and a type “SVC Selection” which contains a list of (currently up to 6) references to “SVC Definition” objects.
The object type list does show the correct data, but both actions “Preview” and “Edit” do not contain the first element of the corresponding list. Action “Copy” correctly opens the edit form with all elements, but saving it removes the first element from being displayed.

Think that both type definitons are ok:

[
  {
    "type": "section",
    "name": "section-58598",
    "label": "SVC Definition",
    "fields": [
      {
        "type": "text",
        "name": "text-55317",
        "label": "Service Definition"
      }
    ]
  }
]

and:

[
  {
    "type": "section",
    "name": "section-36608",
    "label": "SVC Selection",
    "fields": [
      {
        "type": "text",
        "name": "text-63889",
        "label": "SVC Selection Name"
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "type": "ref-section",
    "name": "ref-section-70589",
    "label": "SVC Definition 01",
    "reference": {
      "type_id": 6,
      "section_name": "section-58598",
      "selected_fields": [
        "text-55317"
      ]
    },
    "fields": [
      {
        "type": "ref-section-field",
        "name": "ref-section-70589-field",
        "label": "SVC Definition 01"
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "type": "ref-section",
    "name": "ref-section-96355",
    "label": "SVC Definition 02",
    "reference": {
      "type_id": 6,
      "section_name": "section-58598",
      "selected_fields": [
        "text-55317"
      ]
    },
    "fields": [
      {
        "type": "ref-section-field",
        "name": "ref-section-96355-field",
        "label": "SVC Definition 02"
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "type": "ref-section",
    "name": "ref-section-39335",
    "label": "SVC Definition 03",
    "reference": {
      "type_id": 6,
      "section_name": "section-58598",
      "selected_fields": [
        "text-55317"
      ]
    },
    "fields": [
      {
        "type": "ref-section-field",
        "name": "ref-section-39335-field",
        "label": "SVC Definition 03"
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "type": "ref-section",
    "name": "ref-section-13507",
    "label": "SVC Definition 04",
    "reference": {
      "type_id": 6,
      "section_name": "section-58598",
      "selected_fields": [
        "text-55317"
      ]
    },
    "fields": [
      {
        "type": "ref-section-field",
        "name": "ref-section-13507-field",
        "label": "SVC Definition 04"
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "type": "ref-section",
    "name": "ref-section-65062",
    "label": "SVC Definition 05",
    "reference": {
      "type_id": 6,
      "section_name": "section-58598",
      "selected_fields": [
        "text-55317"
      ]
    },
    "fields": [
      {
        "type": "ref-section-field",
        "name": "ref-section-65062-field",
        "label": "SVC Definition 05"
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "type": "ref-section",
    "name": "ref-section-74091",
    "label": "SVC Definition 06",
    "reference": {
      "type_id": 6,
      "section_name": "section-58598",
      "selected_fields": [
        "text-55317"
      ]
    },
    "fields": [
      {
        "type": "ref-section-field",
        "name": "ref-section-74091-field",
        "label": "SVC Definition 06"
      }
    ]
  }
]

(using V2.0 docker, will see if i can attach an image for clarification)
Kind regards, Michael

2

Hi @MiB,
thanks for the info, we will have a look at it and tell you if we need more Input.

BR Adnan

3

Hi @MiB ,
can you go to the type list table ([your_datagerry]/framework/type), export both types as JSON and post them here?

The two posted Types of you are from the diagnistic area of the type definition, which is a simplified version to display the type.

BR Adnan

4

Hi Adnan,

i have setup a new instance and tried to reproduce the issue but currently everything works as expected. So maybe it was a misconfiguration or wrong procedure, sorry for taking your time.

Kind regards,
Michael